App
App copied to clipboard
[No QA] Update ios files
Details
Commits changes to ios/NewExpensify.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj and ios/NewExpensify.xcworkspace/contents.xcworkspacedata after running pod install
Fixed Issues
$ https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C03TQ48KC/p1667940701889889
Tests
- Run
cd ios && pod install - Verify that there are no file changes
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
QA Steps
None.
- [ ] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
PR Author Checklist
- [x] I linked the correct issue in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
Testssection - [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the
QA stepssection - [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- [x] iOS / native
- [x] Android / native
- [x] iOS / Safari
- [x] Android / Chrome
- [x] MacOS / Chrome
- [x] MacOS / Desktop
- [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
- [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick) - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all
src/languages/*files - [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [x] The file is named correctly
- [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [x] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
PR Reviewer Checklist
The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed
- [ ] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- [ ] I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [ ] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - [ ] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - [ ] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [ ] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- [ ] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- [ ] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [ ] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- [ ] iOS / native
- [ ] Android / native
- [ ] iOS / Safari
- [ ] Android / Chrome
- [ ] MacOS / Chrome
- [ ] MacOS / Desktop
- [ ] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- [ ] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all
src/languages/*files - [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [ ] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [ ] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [ ] The file is named correctly
- [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [ ] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [ ] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [ ] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- [ ] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [ ] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [ ] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
Screenshots
Web
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
iOS
Android
Check out this diff from the React Native Upgrade Helper: https://react-native-community.github.io/upgrade-helper/?from=0.69.3&to=0.71.0-rc.0
It includes the inverse of (all?) these changes. Not sure if it's all correct or if those changes were made in the rn template app with a good reason or what. Just letting you know why you're seeing this diff / why the contents.xcworkspacedata was deleted
So we should probably dig in and make sure we understand these changes well before merging this (and maybe update the .gitignore accordingly, if needed)
@roryabraham it looks like we're version 0.70.4, should we just upgrade to 0.71.0? This diff is pretty annoying and I get it every time.
Agree it's annoying. Maybe we should just merge it and see if there are any problems
Sounds good. @Luke9389 @roryabraham would either of you be willing to fill the reviewer checklist? or are we skipping it here?
I got it
- [x] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- [x] I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - [x] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - [x] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- [x] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- [x] iOS / native
- [x] Android / native
- [x] iOS / Safari
- [x] Android / Chrome
- [x] MacOS / Chrome
- [x] MacOS / Desktop
- [x] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- [x] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all
src/languages/*files - [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [x] The file is named correctly
- [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [x] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
Getting a weird checklist error
Current runner version: '2.299.1'
Operating System
Runner Image
Runner Image Provisioner
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Secret source: Actions
Prepare workflow directory
Prepare all required actions
Getting action download info
Download action repository 'Expensify/App@main' (SHA:da8ffb[2](https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/runs/3448503928/jobs/5915407473#step:1:2)e002088c4[6](https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/runs/3448503928/jobs/5915407473#step:1:7)86109[11](https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/runs/3448503928/jobs/5915407473#step:1:13)4cb77705e625dd03)
Error: Can't find 'action.yml', 'action.yaml' or 'Dockerfile' under '/home/runner/work/_actions/Expensify/App/main/.github/actions/javascript/contributorChecklist'. Did you forget to run actions/checkout before running your local action?
Merged main since this PR is a couple of weeks old. Hopefully it will fix the checklist error.
Merging since checks are passing now.
@luacmartins looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.
Tests passed. Removing label.
:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.
🚀 Deployed to staging by @luacmartins in version: 1.2.31-0 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
The production deploy comment failed for this PR, but this was deployed to production on v1.2.32-2 on Nov 28.