App icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
App copied to clipboard

[No QA] Update ios files

Open luacmartins opened this issue 3 years ago • 1 comments

Details

Commits changes to ios/NewExpensify.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj and ios/NewExpensify.xcworkspace/contents.xcworkspacedata after running pod install

Fixed Issues

$ https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C03TQ48KC/p1667940701889889

Tests

  1. Run cd ios && pod install
  2. Verify that there are no file changes
  • [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

QA Steps

None.

  • [ ] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • [x] I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • [x] I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • [x] iOS / native
    • [x] Android / native
    • [x] iOS / Safari
    • [x] Android / Chrome
    • [x] MacOS / Chrome
    • [x] MacOS / Desktop
  • [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
    • [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • [x] The file is named correctly
    • [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • [x] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
    • [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • [ ] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • [ ] I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • [ ] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • [ ] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • [ ] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • [ ] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • [ ] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • [ ] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • [ ] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • [ ] iOS / native
    • [ ] Android / native
    • [ ] iOS / Safari
    • [ ] Android / Chrome
    • [ ] MacOS / Chrome
    • [ ] MacOS / Desktop
  • [ ] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • [ ] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • [ ] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • [ ] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
    • [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • [ ] The file is named correctly
    • [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • [ ] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • [ ] A similar style doesn't already exist
    • [ ] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • [ ] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • [ ] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • [ ] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

luacmartins avatar Nov 08 '22 21:11 luacmartins

Check out this diff from the React Native Upgrade Helper: https://react-native-community.github.io/upgrade-helper/?from=0.69.3&to=0.71.0-rc.0

It includes the inverse of (all?) these changes. Not sure if it's all correct or if those changes were made in the rn template app with a good reason or what. Just letting you know why you're seeing this diff / why the contents.xcworkspacedata was deleted

So we should probably dig in and make sure we understand these changes well before merging this (and maybe update the .gitignore accordingly, if needed)

roryabraham avatar Nov 11 '22 23:11 roryabraham

@roryabraham it looks like we're version 0.70.4, should we just upgrade to 0.71.0? This diff is pretty annoying and I get it every time.

Luke9389 avatar Nov 21 '22 20:11 Luke9389

Agree it's annoying. Maybe we should just merge it and see if there are any problems

roryabraham avatar Nov 22 '22 17:11 roryabraham

Sounds good. @Luke9389 @roryabraham would either of you be willing to fill the reviewer checklist? or are we skipping it here?

luacmartins avatar Nov 22 '22 19:11 luacmartins

I got it

Luke9389 avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 Luke9389

  • [x] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • [x] I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • [x] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • [x] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • [x] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • [x] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • [x] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • [x] iOS / native
    • [x] Android / native
    • [x] iOS / Safari
    • [x] Android / Chrome
    • [x] MacOS / Chrome
    • [x] MacOS / Desktop
  • [x] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • [x] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • [x] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • [x] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
    • [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • [x] The file is named correctly
    • [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • [x] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
    • [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Luke9389 avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 Luke9389

Getting a weird checklist error

Current runner version: '2.299.1'
Operating System
Runner Image
Runner Image Provisioner
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Secret source: Actions
Prepare workflow directory
Prepare all required actions
Getting action download info
Download action repository 'Expensify/App@main' (SHA:da8ffb[2](https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/runs/3448503928/jobs/5915407473#step:1:2)e002088c4[6](https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/runs/3448503928/jobs/5915407473#step:1:7)86109[11](https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/runs/3448503928/jobs/5915407473#step:1:13)4cb77705e625dd03)
Error: Can't find 'action.yml', 'action.yaml' or 'Dockerfile' under '/home/runner/work/_actions/Expensify/App/main/.github/actions/javascript/contributorChecklist'. Did you forget to run actions/checkout before running your local action?

Luke9389 avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 Luke9389

Merged main since this PR is a couple of weeks old. Hopefully it will fix the checklist error.

luacmartins avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 luacmartins

Merging since checks are passing now.

luacmartins avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 luacmartins

@luacmartins looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

melvin-bot[bot] avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 melvin-bot[bot]

Tests passed. Removing label.

luacmartins avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 luacmartins

:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify avatar Nov 22 '22 20:11 OSBotify

🚀 Deployed to staging by @luacmartins in version: 1.2.31-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

OSBotify avatar Nov 24 '22 00:11 OSBotify

The production deploy comment failed for this PR, but this was deployed to production on v1.2.32-2 on Nov 28.

luacmartins avatar Dec 06 '22 17:12 luacmartins