Emil Hvitfeldt

This issue is reminding myself to add a recipe step that implements the SMOGN method.

We should also document what kind of rounding is being done for the `prop` argument.

Thank you for the feedback! We are working on the website right now on a semi-major redo. So we will make sure to take this problem into consideration when we...

Hello @stevenprimeaux 👋 We are aware that these packages have been removed from CRAN. We are in contact with the maintainers and they should be back on CRAN soon!

Hello @rorynolan 👋 You appears to be correct, That section is indeed [over 3 years old](https://github.com/tidymodels/tidymodels.org/commit/2b76634eadb976a631d7c816cf34fa7ad51bcdf0#diff-989271920811311e807ab1c3ad907c567a1987b911007d765f0b73cbbc718fe0R437) so it isn't surprising that the requirements have changed. Thank you once again, we...

Yes that is true, `finalize()` and `new_iteration_results()` doesn't default to `NULL`.

If you set `verbosity = 2` then parsnip records run time. But there isn't a easy way to handle this in tune, and it wouldn't record the preprocessing times which...

Hello @trevorcampbell Thanks for the issue! I'm moving it to {tune} since that is where the issue lies. The error is happening in `tune:::predict_model()` when `predict()` is called. Since `predict()`...

No problem! We much rather have an useful issue posted in the wrong repository and move it, than not have the issue posted at all :)

Hello @epiheather ! wonderful issue! From the {parsnip} side we can easily extract some more information since the classes of the parsnip models have informative names