Léo Gaspard
Léo Gaspard
Maybe it'd make sense to have a `.preprocess_input(Fn(T) -> Option)` on the builder, that'd hide the creation of the ValueGenerator? With this setup, bolero reporting the ratio of Some to...
I wanted the same and came here, ready to do a PR, but after the borrow checker reminded me that just copy-pasting immutable code doesn't actually make for valid mutable...
I think something that Orgzly could add would be repositories limited to a single file? This way it could use the same intent as the one for “Import Org file”,...
As for donating money, I think BountySource (even though I don't like the idea of giving 10% of the donation to a for-profit intermediary myself) could handle this with a...
Taking one step back: do we actually need to specify export indirection? I cannot think of a way export indirection can affect wasm-virtual-machine behavior. The only way I can think...
> If supporting multiple runtimes (without an ability to modify some of them) was not a concern, I would really just create a separate custom section in the wasm module...
Hmmmm I think your link mostly means that we must specify whether we charge before or after runtime-typechecking the indirectly-called function? IMO if we say that the runtime-typeck must happen...
Right, that's because all of `idb`'s current tests run in node, which AFAICT never can use the multi-threaded executor because they don't have web workers. The exact commit I'm using...
Hmm that's weird, I was unable to reproduce without adding the `run_in_browser` line… :shrug: Happy that you managed to reproduce anyway!
Hmm… maybe an idea: what if `Transaction` were not a type, but a function that takes a `Future`? The usage would then be something like (pseudo-code for clarity): ```rust db.transaction(&["store"],...