CppCXY

> I just did a preliminary benchmark here: [#2482 (comment)](https://github.com/LuaLS/lua-language-server/issues/2482#issuecomment-2385017356) > > * The **compile** time of a large lua file (~8K lines) is `40%` faster 🚀 > * But...

> * but it's just on par with regular luals `0.71s` 🤔 (a little bit slower to be exact) Is there any comprehensive performance report, such as a comparison of...

By conducting startup tests on the luals project itself, the manually measured results are roughly as follows. It seems to be getting slower and slower, possibly due to my own...

amazing test result, I also got the same speed test results on luals-3.11:  on luajit jit-off:  The speed improvement is about 40%. It might be faster if we...

The porting to LuaJIT has been completed, and the luajit branch has been merged into the main trunk. You can download it from the [release](https://github.com/LuaLS/lua-language-server-rust/releases), and I have already migrated...

Maybe we can use the jit.dump module to see the reasons for jit failure and then consider targeted optimizations. I see many traces about inspect and luadoc.

> Just to note that calls into C code cannot be JIT compiled, so if LuaLS calls into C a lot (into bee.lua), then it's likely the JIT isn't able...

here are the simple: ```txt File: luadoc.lua, Line: 939, Error: NYI: bytecode FNEW , Count: 405 File: compile.lua, Line: 604, Error: inner loop in root trace, Count: 280 File: guide.lua,...

> bee.lua uses the "classic Lua/C API". a bit mistaken; the luajit porting work was done on my rust version, not bee.lua. The entire bee API was implemented by me...

> Are there any missing features compared to the vscode version? Most useful features are supported, you can see the feature list of LSP4IJ. https://github.com/redhat-developer/lsp4ij/blob/main/docs/LSPSupport.md