Node-based properties

[kordjamshidi]

trafficstars

Does the new syntax of declaring the properties constrains us at all for the usage of the properties? Or is it only a matter of presentation for now? Do we want to be constrained such that we can not use a property for a node if it is not defined for it? even if the base type is the same?

[kordjamshidi]

It would be good if you could add this info to wiki.

[sameersingh]

Right now there are no constraints, really. But we should decide what we want the node properties to mean, and the constraints that fall out of that. Accordingly, I can change the implementation, and write documentation.

[kordjamshidi]

Yes, right. Let us proceed with the application and decide for this later, because constraints are both good and bad. I keep the issue open.

[danyaljj]

I believe this is resolved @kordjamshidi ?

[kordjamshidi]

Actually, we did not do any action on it, it is an open question.

[danyaljj]

Then I guess I misunderstood the purpose of the issue. Could you give an example / or any other clarification?