CharliePoole

I'm in favor of changing to give an error when a value type is used. I don't think we should keep both overloads. On the more general issue... I didn't...

Your probably right... with the usual proviso that I haven't worked seriously on the framework since 2017 and anything I say could be out of date. But maybe history helps...

We once (maybe still do) supported raw arrays as sources... both typed and object. This led to issues when the test method took a single argument of `int[]`, `object[]`, etc....

Moved to V4 as a design issue.

Failing merge is due to a continuing issue in AppVeyor. Please review anyway. If someone wants to download and try it that would be great!

@mikkelbu No, I changed output to package in .gitignore, but I neglected to remove the directory. :-(

@OsirisTerje Some general comments re your comments... no conclusion. :-) __Cake vs C#__ Cake is, of course c#. It's indeed possible to use the `.cs` extension, which gives you a...

@OsirisTerje @mikkelbu @rprouse [sorry if I missed anyone else who is "into" cake] I'd like to suggest looking at this a bit differently. We already have extensive cake tooling, starting...

@veleek Thanks for the review. I realize this was a very large change. I liked all your suggestions and they are reflected in the last commit. I'll wait to see...

@OsirisTerje To avoid later merge problems, I'd like to either get this in or delete it asap. I have two or three branches waiting to either merge this change or...