CharliePoole

NUnit tests have a "Name" (which is the display name) and a "FullName". The "FullName" is precisely what you are asking for. Naturally, each runner gets to decide what to...

Yes, I meant nunit3-console.exe. We've always called that the NUnit console runner, but I can see it may get confusing in the context of dotnet test. Theadapter is a bit...

One possibility for the adapter is for it to figure out what program is using it and apply different defaults. IIRC there is already a little bit of that in...

@julealgon I agree with you that we should treat pass as pass. (option 1) Just wanted to lay out what appear to me to be the options. Treating warnings as...

@nunit/framework-team This is been around for a while (2018) without a decision as to how it will work. With version 4 coming up, wouldn't this be a good time to...

You would probably have to use the debugger to confirm, but here's what I think happens... First Case: * Compiler interprets argument as an Int32 * TestAttribute performs no special...

A general principle behind the design of NUnit - way back before NUnit 3 even - was this: "If you tell us to do something, or use something, we'll try....

A thought: maybe we should do all the conversions that we already do on numerics (e.g. for equality). That would probably feel more consistent. If so, we should do them...

I see two sides here. (It's a curse... 😄 ) OTOH, as you say, why do it if it's easy enough for the user to do. OTOH, @ChrisMaddock , who...

I agree with supporting the feature although I'm not keen on the "unification" idea itself.