CharliePoole

I'd like to put the problem in perspective, without necessarily advocating any particular solution. The NUnit framework provides test results both incrementally and as a final result for the entire...

@rprouse Do we need an Project at the github organization level to communicate API changes among the different NUnit projects?

@rprouse Great I see we have a new project with this issue in it. I'll add some of mine as well. Once we have a few things, we can figure...

I think that two thngs should be clarified at the point this is announced... 1. __Exactly__ what is meant by supporting or not supporting. We all know there are a...

Looking back at Rob's list, I see the first two items relate to the engine rather than the framework, so maybe this is a more global discussion than just the...

@ChrisMaddock Some thoughts on your thoughts... :smile: * I'd remove the ability of the user to specify how AppDomains are used but still reserve the possibility to make use of...

Regarding settings, I understood you to mean that you would get rid of the entire file. I agree that the engine itself should not use settings. We did it that...

Regarding RuntimeFramework determination... I noticed that problem in a recent issue as well. IIRC, we originally only selected the highest runtime for all assemblies run __in the same process__. It's...

I agree with @stevenaw about Generics... I've tried twiice to do an extensive rewrite based on generics, but I couldn't do it without introducing breaking changes. I'm fairly sure it...

@stevenaw I agree that `FrameworkController` forms an API, which we try not to break very often, since the engine uses it. However, it's a very flexible API since it passes...