CharliePoole

I agree entirely about the usefulness of this feature. It's what we do in our gui for example. However, to my knowledge, there is no way to tell VS to...

Yes, that's possible. Not as cool as changing the icon, but would have saved you time. I'll experiment with this.

Another possibility: report the method itself as a non-runnable test case, without parameters. That would show up in the tree and we could tailor the message to explain what happened.

It's hard to imagine that this can be anything other than a reporting problem, since NUnit doesn't know or care it's being run by the adapter. One way to double...

@Denis535 Perhaps you could give some info about what version of the NUnit framework you are using, what runtime you are targeting and what software you use to run the...

Part of the confusion is that the github feature is locked down more than the old zenhub feature, which I think you could still use if you have it in...

@jocutar Was this fixed by #97, which was in the 3.5 release?

@sm-g This issue is about a problem with [Theory] which is quite specialized. If you have a problem with general tests, it would be better to start a new issue....

@EricStG Could you clarify whether your problem is with [Test] or [Theory]? Both have been reported in this thread. @nunit/framework-team This is a good one for somebody to take on...

So, any random values generated come from autofixture. I'd say that someone could look at the code quickly and verify that they don't use NUnit's guaranteed repeatable random values, but...