Bogdan Popa

Yes, async support is currently limited to being able to run async actors, but there are no concurrency benefits to doing so at the moment as the workers block on...

Sounds like a good idea to me. Feel free to open a PR and I'll take a look!

Thanks, but I don't think the additional hooks are needed since someone can extend the class and override the channel and connection properties instead.

@Niols I believe this has been fixed for some time now, so I'm going to go ahead and close this issue. Please feel free to re-open if I'm wrong.

This looks like a cool idea, but I'm not sure what is actionable about this issue. I'd happily accept a PR adding this method to the cookbook!

> I'm happy to help with documentation, but I have to admit I'm confused as to how to get it to work. Getting the synchronous example from the homepage `example.py`...

Thanks, that does look wrong. We probably added new middleware over time and forgot to update that sentence.

> Would you be open to contributions for this PR? Yup. A PR would be welcome.

I think I'd prefer having this in a separate package after all. If anyone makes one, ping me and I'll add a link!

This is probably some sort of resource leak. The underlying RabbitMQ client we use, pika, creates a socket pair per connection in order to handle interruptions, so this error is...