Max Base

Results 351 comments of Max Base

After change version 1.4 to1 .7: ``` Warning: Unexpected input(s) 'pasive', valid inputs are ['sftp', 'host', 'port', 'username', 'password', 'remote_folder', 'local_folder', 'cleanup', 'include', 'exclude', 'passive'] Run sand4rt/[email protected] Deploying... (node:16[2](https://github.com/BaseMax/****/actions/runs/****/jobs/7193954733#step:3:2)7) [DEP0005]...

I deleted `pasive` parameter from GitHub Action. Still it's same and the warning: ``` Run sand4rt/[email protected] Deploying... (node:[17](https://github.com/BaseMax/*****/actions/runs/4158637741/jobs/7193992520#step:3:18)[1](https://github.com/BaseMax/*****/actions/runs/4158637741/jobs/7193992520#step:6:1)[3](https://github.com/BaseMax/*****/actions/runs/4158637741/jobs/7193992520#step:6:3)) [DEP000[5](https://github.com/BaseMax/*****/actions/runs/4158637741/jobs/7193992520#step:6:5)] DeprecationWarning: Buffer() is deprecated due to security and usability issues. Please...

Thanks, Yes, I did see some error message/warning. We have another repository similar to this, We can take action these repos after this. So no worry to apply minimal apply...

The difference between this repository and another repository is that the other one only focuses on the database. https://github.com/BaseMax/GooglePlayDatabaseMirror So I think it's best to use the final version of...

Yes, you can. Thanks for your description. It's good job: mix some different sources. > Maybe your last sentence was just ambiguous – and you did in fact mean using...

Thanks, I create a tag: v1.0.0 We still not have a good example file. Maybe need to adding some different example to `example.php` file. Even wider than the wiki

Published: https://github.com/BaseMax/GooglePlayWebServiceAPI/releases/tag/v1.0.0

Yes. You prepared the wiki very well. We can copy examples code from wiki to examples.php file.

> Be welcome... Done. https://github.com/BaseMax/GooglePlayWebServiceAPI/commit/cee47f7a2da63661ae3a516e3ab11290aff59502 This repository is licensed under MIT right now. Just curiosity, Can I ask your reasons for choosing GPLv2 license? And why not to MIT?

It seems this issue is too old for 3 years ago :) Nice man.