azure-rest-api-specs Adding logSpecifications to 2021-09-01 and 2022-01-01 versions

This PR intends to add logSpecifications for operations API

What's the purpose of the update?
- [ ] new service onboarding
- [] new API version
- [ ] update existing version for new feature
- [X ] update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- [ ] Other, please clarify
When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. Already deployed
When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month. Already published
If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
- [ ] SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
- [ ] SDK of Python
- [ ] SDK of Java
- [ ] SDK of Js
- [ ] SDK of Go
- [ ] PowerShell
- [ ] CLI
- [ ] Terraform
- [X] No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

[x] I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
[x] I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
[x] Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: :warning:

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

Change to data plane APIs

Adding new properties

All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

[x] Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version -[x] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
[x] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
[ ] If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

[ ] Removing API(s) in a stable version
[ ] Removing properties in a stable version
[ ] Removing API version(s) in a stable version
[X] Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
[ ] Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

Oct 17 '22 19:10 lajillel

Hi, @lajillel Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

Oct 17 '22 19:10 openapi-workflow-bot[bot]

Hi, @lajillel your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]).

Oct 17 '22 19:10 openapi-workflow-bot[bot]

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.7)]	new version	base version
storagecache.json	2021-09-01(494d499)	2021-09-01(main)
storagecache.json	2022-01-01(494d499)	2022-01-01(main)

Rule	Message
`❌` 1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse	The new version has a new property 'logSpecifications' in response that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1267:15 Old: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1267:15
`❌` 1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse	The new version has a new property 'logSpecifications' in response that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1371:15 Old: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1371:15

️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0)	new version	base version
package-2022-01	package-2022-01(494d499)	package-2022-01(main)
package-2021-09	package-2021-09(494d499)	package-2021-09(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Rule	Message
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1055
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1110
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1165
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1104
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1159
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1214
:warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames	OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'StorageTargetModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'StorageTarget' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1269
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1251
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: rotationToLatestKeyVersionEnabled Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1651
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: extendedGroups Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1757
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: encryptLdapConnection Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1792
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: requireValidCertificate Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1796
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: autoDownloadCertificate Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1800
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: suid Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1895
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: submountAccess Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1899
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: rootSquash Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L1903
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: toBeExportedForShoebox Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L2581
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1355
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: rotationToLatestKeyVersionEnabled Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1764
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: extendedGroups Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1870
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: encryptLdapConnection Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1905
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: requireValidCertificate Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1909
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: autoDownloadCertificate Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L1913
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: suid Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L2008
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: submountAccess Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L2012
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: rootSquash Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L2016
:warning: R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: toBeExportedForShoebox Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2022-01-01/storagecache.json#L2742
:warning: R4030 - UniqueXmsExample	Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: StorageTargets_List Location: Microsoft.StorageCache/stable/2021-09-01/storagecache.json#L810

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passed for PoliCheck.

️⚠️SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

The following tags are being changed in this PR

"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/494d499528ae3c84c3c1e79951bc7a0e56bf4a82/specification/storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2022-01">storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2022-01
"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/494d499528ae3c84c3c1e79951bc7a0e56bf4a82/specification/storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2021-09">storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-09

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Rule	Message
:warning: UnkownSecurityScheme	"readme":"storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2022-01", "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken, AzureKey, Anonymous"
:warning: UnkownSecurityScheme	"readme":"storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-09", "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken, AzureKey, Anonymous"

️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for CadlValidation.

️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Summary.

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

Oct 17 '22 19:10 openapi-pipeline-app[bot]

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

Breaking Changes Tracking

❌azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/storagecache/armstoragecache - 3.0.0

+	Function `*CachesClient.BeginCreateOrUpdate` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, Cache, *CachesClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, *CachesClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)`
+	Function `*CachesClient.Update` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, Cache, *CachesClientUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, *CachesClientUpdateOptions)`
+	Function `*StorageTargetsClient.BeginCreateOrUpdate` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, string, StorageTarget, *StorageTargetsClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, string, *StorageTargetsClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)`
+	Struct `CloudError` has been removed

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 8.15.0 -> 8.19.2
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v8.19.2>
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-storagecache [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
- azure_mgmt_storagecache-1.0.0b1-py3-none-any.whl
- azure-mgmt-storagecache-1.0.0b1.zip
```
info	[Changelog]
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-net warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. SDK Automation 14.0.0

warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION [email protected]/[email protected] --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/storagecache/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
warn	No file changes detected after generation
warn	No package detected after generation

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-storagecache [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/storagecache/armstoragecache [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected

info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - Function `*CachesClient.BeginCreateOrUpdate` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, Cache, *CachesClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, *CachesClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `*CachesClient.Update` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, Cache, *CachesClientUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, *CachesClientUpdateOptions)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `*StorageTargetsClient.BeginCreateOrUpdate` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, string, StorageTarget, *StorageTargetsClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, string, *StorageTargetsClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions)`
info	[Changelog] - Struct `CloudError` has been removed
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New field `Storagetarget` in struct `StorageTargetsClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Cache` in struct `CachesClientBeginCreateOrUpdateOptions`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Cache` in struct `CachesClientUpdateOptions`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 5 breaking change(s), 3 additive change(s).

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Cannot generate changelog because the codes of local and npm may be the same.

️✔️@azure/arm-storagecache [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
- azure-arm-storagecache-5.2.1.tgz
```
info	[Changelog]
error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
```

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh]  old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation

️✔️storagecache [View full logs]

️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

❌Failed [Logs] Generate from 44a6165274558a051703b37393901ba5eebd4198. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json

❌Az.storagecache [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

Oct 17 '22 19:10 openapi-pipeline-app[bot]

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/storagecache/armstoragecache	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Python	track2_azure-mgmt-storagecache	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Java	azure-resourcemanager-storagecache	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
JavaScript	@azure/arm-storagecache	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

Oct 17 '22 19:10 openapi-pipeline-app[bot]

NewApiVersionRequired reason: A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support. EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

Oct 17 '22 19:10 openapi-workflow-bot[bot]

Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

Oct 21 '22 02:10 openapi-workflow-bot[bot]

We decided to not proceed with these changes. Hence closing this request. Thanks!

Oct 31 '22 17:10 lajillel