azure-rest-api-specs icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
azure-rest-api-specs copied to clipboard

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.CostManagement to add version stable/2021-10-01

Open mitagarg opened this issue 4 years ago • 7 comments

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • [ ] new service onboarding
    • [ ] new API version
    • [ ] update existing version for new feature
    • [ ] update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • [ ] Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • [ ] SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • [ ] SDK of Python
    • [ ] SDK of Java
    • [ ] SDK of Js
    • [ ] SDK of Go
    • [ ] PowerShell
    • [ ] CLI
    • [ ] Terraform
    • [ ] No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: :warning:

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • [ ] Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
  • [ ] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • [ ] If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • [ ] Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • [ ] Removing properties in a stable version
  • [ ] Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • [ ] Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • [ ] Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

mitagarg avatar Sep 24 '21 22:09 mitagarg

Hi, @mitagarg Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?
  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️❌LintDiff: 9 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Exports_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L98
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Exports_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L160
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Views_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L118
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Views_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L155
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Views_GetByScope' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L246
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Views_CreateOrUpdateByScope' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L286
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Alerts_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L440
    R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'Alerts_Dismiss' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L483
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ForecastDataset' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L2166
    :warning: R2018 - XmsEnumValidation The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: direction
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1286


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.'
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L270
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.CostManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1103
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigDefinition' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L396
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigTimePeriod' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L438
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigDataset' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L457
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigDatasetConfiguration' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L507
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigAggregation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L519
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigSorting' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L543
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigGrouping' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L563
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigFilter' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L580
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigComparisonExpression' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L625
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L669
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L684
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ProxyResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L713
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigDefinition' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1136
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigTimePeriod' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1178
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigDataset' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1197
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigDatasetConfiguration' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1247
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigAggregation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1259
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigSorting' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1283
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigGrouping' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1303
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigFilter' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1320
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ReportConfigComparisonExpression' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1365
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1568
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1593
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ProxyResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1622
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'DismissAlertPayload' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1999
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'OperationListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L2062
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'display' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L2089
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ForecastDefinition' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L2111
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️❌Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 6 Errors, 14 Warnings failed [Detail]
    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:
    Rule Message
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'sasToken' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L893:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-01-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L634:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'storageAccount' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L893:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-01-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L634:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'partitionData' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L786:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-01-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L523:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'partitionData' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L776:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-01-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L513:7
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'resourceId' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L862:9
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-01-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L603:9
    1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'resourceId' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L890:5
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-01-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L631:5


    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with latest preview version:

    Rule Message
    :warning: 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/{scope}/providers/Microsoft.CostManagement/budgets' removed or restructured?
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L382:5
    :warning: 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/{scope}/providers/Microsoft.CostManagement/budgets/{budgetName}' removed or restructured?
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L424:5
    :warning: 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'BudgetModel' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1135:3
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L593:3
    :warning: 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'BudgetProperties' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1135:3
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L593:3
    :warning: 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'BudgetTimePeriod' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1135:3
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L593:3
    :warning: 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'CurrentSpend' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1135:3
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L593:3
    :warning: 1007 - RemovedClientParameter The new version is missing a client parameter that was found in the old version. Was 'scopeBudgetParameter' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L2440:3
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L1396:3
    :warning: 1007 - RemovedClientParameter The new version is missing a client parameter that was found in the old version. Was 'budgetNameParameter' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L2440:3
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L1396:3
    :warning: 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'sasToken' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L893:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2020-12-01-preview/costmanagement.exports.json#L630:7
    :warning: 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'storageAccount' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L893:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2020-12-01-preview/costmanagement.exports.json#L630:7
    :warning: 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'target' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1570:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L616:7
    :warning: 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'details' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.json#L1570:7
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2019-04-01-preview/costmanagement.json#L616:7
    :warning: 1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'resourceId' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L862:9
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2020-12-01-preview/costmanagement.exports.json#L599:9
    :warning: 1034 - AddedRequiredProperty The new version has new required property 'resourceId' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2021-10-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L890:5
    Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/preview/2020-12-01-preview/costmanagement.exports.json#L627:5
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️❌[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    AutorestCore/Exception "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-10",
    "details":"Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure."
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-costmanagement - 3.0.0
    +	Model ExportExecution no longer has parameter tags
    +	Model QueryFilter no longer has parameter dimensions
    +	Model QueryFilter no longer has parameter tags
    +	Model QueryResult no longer has parameter e_tag
    +	Model QueryResult no longer has parameter location
    +	Model QueryResult no longer has parameter sku
    +	Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter dimensions
    +	Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tag_key
    +	Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tag_value
    +	Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tags
    +	Model View no longer has parameter currency
    +	Model View no longer has parameter data_set
    +	Model View no longer has parameter date_range
    +	Model View no longer has parameter include_monetary_commitment
    +	Operation ExportsOperations.get has a new signature
    +	Operation ExportsOperations.list has a new signature
    +	Removed operation group GenerateReservationDetailsReportOperations
    +	Removed operation group SettingsOperations
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2021-01-01/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2020-06-01/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-11-01/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-10-01/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2019-01-01/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - costmanagement/mgmt/2018-05-31/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2019-03-01/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2018-08-01-preview/costmanagement - v57.4.0
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 0aa79a0df2ef1b57eeba311327883fd94c394ada. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️costmanagement/mgmt/2021-01-01/costmanagement [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] This is a new package
    • ️✔️costmanagement/mgmt/2020-06-01/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️costmanagement/mgmt/2019-11-01/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️costmanagement/mgmt/2019-10-01/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️costmanagement/mgmt/2019-01-01/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️costmanagement/mgmt/2018-05-31/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2019-03-01/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/costmanagement/mgmt/2018-08-01-preview/costmanagement [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 0aa79a0df2ef1b57eeba311327883fd94c394ada. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-costmanagement [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryFilter has a new parameter dimension
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryFilter has a new parameter not_property
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryFilter has a new parameter tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportExecution has a new parameter error
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportExecution has a new parameter e_tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model View has a new parameter dataset
      info	[Changelog]   - Model CommonExportProperties has a new parameter run_history
      info	[Changelog]   - Model CommonExportProperties has a new parameter next_run_time_estimate
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Export has a new parameter run_history
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Export has a new parameter next_run_time_estimate
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportProperties has a new parameter run_history
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportProperties has a new parameter next_run_time_estimate
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter has a new parameter dimension
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter has a new parameter not_property
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter has a new parameter tag
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Operation ExportsOperations.get has a new signature
      info	[Changelog]   - Operation ExportsOperations.list has a new signature
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryFilter no longer has parameter tags
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryFilter no longer has parameter dimensions
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ExportExecution no longer has parameter tags
      info	[Changelog]   - Model View no longer has parameter data_set
      info	[Changelog]   - Model View no longer has parameter date_range
      info	[Changelog]   - Model View no longer has parameter currency
      info	[Changelog]   - Model View no longer has parameter include_monetary_commitment
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryResult no longer has parameter location
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryResult no longer has parameter e_tag
      info	[Changelog]   - Model QueryResult no longer has parameter sku
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tags
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter dimensions
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tag_key
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ReportConfigFilter no longer has parameter tag_value
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group GenerateReservationDetailsReportOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group SettingsOperations
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 0aa79a0df2ef1b57eeba311327883fd94c394ada. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
      warn	Skip detect changed packages
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    CLA assistant check
    All CLA requirements met.

    ghost avatar Sep 24 '21 22:09 ghost

    Hi @mitagarg, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    Next Steps to Merge

    ⌛ Please wait. Next steps to merge this PR are being evaluated by automation. ⌛