azure-functions-host
azure-functions-host copied to clipboard
Azure
Unhandled host error: Headers are read-only when accessing the Response object in HTTP Trigger function.
Investigative information
- Timestamp: Testing locally, see example for reproduction
- Function App version: Core Tools 4.0.4544 Commit hash: N/A (64-bit), Function Runtime: 4.3.2.18186
- Programming language: C#, .NET6
Repro steps
When defining the following function and calling it, it will correctly return the "OK".
[FunctionName("BotThingy")]
[UsedImplicitly]
public async Task RunThis(
[HttpTrigger("get", Route = "test")]
HttpRequest request)
{
request.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode = 200;
await using var w = new StreamWriter(request.HttpContext.Response.Body);
await w.WriteLineAsync("OK");
await w.FlushAsync();
}
however the logs will be filled with an attempt to access the response object AFTER taking control of it in the body of the function.
[2022-05-24T20:04:44.104Z] An unhandled host error has occurred.
[2022-05-24T20:04:44.104Z] Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core: Headers are read-only, response has already started.
Background
Why we do this: The MS Bot framework to write Teams App Bots requires to be wired up to an HTTP endpoint as such:
// botFrameworkHttpAdapter is of type IBotFrameworkHttpAdapter from assembly Microsoft.Bot.Builder.Integration.AspNet.Core
// bot is of type IBot from Microsoft.Bot.Builder
await botFrameworkHttpAdapter.ProcessAsync(request, request.HttpContext.Response, bot);
Expected behavior
The functions host should be able to deal with the situation that a HTTP trigger function access the response object directly for, well, reaons. The following article here suggests a way how middleware can safely add headers when it is possible to do so: "Add Headers To A Response In ASP.NET 5"
As a workaround, if I change the return of the function to Task<IActionResult> and then change the return to
return new NullResult()
where NullResult is
public class NullResult : IActionResult
{
public Task ExecuteResultAsync(ActionContext context)
=> Task.FromResult(Task.CompletedTask);
}
the problem appears to go away.
@flq can you try once again with the latest runtime version 4.5.2 and verify if you are still seeing this issue? Below is my setup which did not reproduce the issue.
Programming language: C#, .NET6 (in-proc) Core Tools Version: 4.0.4590 Commit hash: N/A (64-bit) Function Runtime Version: 4.5.2.18383
[FunctionName("Function1")]
public static async Task<IActionResult> Run(
[HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, "get", "post", Route = null)] HttpRequest req,
ILogger log)
{
log.LogInformation("C# HTTP trigger function processed a request.");
req.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode = 200;
string name = req.Query["name"];
string requestBody = await new StreamReader(req.Body).ReadToEndAsync();
dynamic data = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(requestBody);
name = name ?? data?.name;
string responseMessage = string.IsNullOrEmpty(name)
? "This HTTP triggered function executed successfully. Pass a name in the query string or in the request body for a personalized response."
: $"Hello, {name}. This HTTP triggered function executed successfully.";
return new OkObjectResult(responseMessage);
}
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 4 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 3 days of this comment.
@surgupta-msft , I think you might have missed a crucial part of the author's post...
His Function was writing to the Response stream directly, and flushing it. Your counter-example is buffering the response and then sending it. These are fundamentally different approaches.
In the author's streaming response scenario, the stream has progressed beyond the point where headers can be added. Whatever is trying to add them is failing.
I have a similar situation where I am trying to control the response directly (in my case it's because I'd like to start responding as soon as my IAsyncEnumerable datasource starts responding with data in an effort to reduce time-to-first byte. However, after my function implementation ends, something in the host/runtime/framework tries to add headers to the response and fails.
For now I'll continue with the author's workaround - but it would be great if it were possibly to stream responses from IAsyncEnumerables.
also, this appears to be related to https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-host/issues/8080
@surgupta-msft yes, I'm also a bit confused about the example you provide - I would have assumed that your example would also have run correctly before whatever you changed, since you actually do provide a return from the function? 🤔
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 4 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 3 days of this comment.
I am the author of the issue and I've responded - correct? So here's my feedback: The proposed code sample does not correspond to the problem outlined in the beginning.
Got it. Yes, I am able to repro the issue. Thanks @flq and @chaospixel for clarifying. We will need investigation here but the requirements mentioned in the issue are clear.
@flq Just wanted to double check if the suggestion provided in related issue is helpful in your case. This will give more data points for our investigation.
While we are investigating this, the workaround suggested above is the correct approach. You can also use another approach to return ContentResult Task<ContentResult> and set StatusCode in it.
