If not, why not give this project to the community for maintenance?

[windsOne]

如果不想维护的话，可否直接交给社区维护~

If not, why not give this project to the community for maintenance?

[windsOne]

@caozhiyuan @yyjdelete

[caozhiyuan]

nayato is responsible to this project , and this project is stable.

you can @ nayato

@windsOne

[fanliang11]

I don't think it's a stable problem. We need more protocol extensions. The open source project surging is also based on dotnetty. I also want dotnetty to be as active as netty.

[windsOne]

@nayato @caozhiyuan I think so

I don't think it's a stable problem. We need more protocol extensions. The open source project surging is also based on dotnetty. I also want dotnetty to be as active as netty.

[InCerryGit]

I don't think it's a stable problem. We need more protocol extensions. The open source project surging is also based on dotnetty. I also want dotnetty to be as active as netty.

I agree

[ScarletKuro]

I also agree. There are a lot of pull requests that are just hanging. There is still lot of stuff to implement like compression etc.

[onatm]

I strongly believe that we should find a way to make this project more active. Last year I started to build an experimental web framework on top of dotnetty but due to the inactivity of the project I decided not to waste time on it and moved to rust programming language...

[caozhiyuan]

@nayato consider give this project to the community for maintenance? may be can consider dotnetfoundation

[brucehu123]

agreeeeee

[stratosblue]

I don't think it's a stable problem. We need more protocol extensions. The open source project surging is also based on dotnetty. I also want dotnetty to be as active as netty.

I think so

[gsw945]

@nayato

[linfx]

why stop it

[gsw945]

Maintenancer has no response until now, but I found SpanNetty, it's an active fork from DotNetty