Krzysztof Wiśniewski

Yee sorry I figured I will just remove and restore it if requested since it wasn't really usable in form that was included.

I also returned this PR to draft state because I figured I should also try how well autocompletion will fit into that design.

Oh I see I didn't push the removal of the callback parameter, sorry for my confusion.

 Idk the message could be better tbh We could incorporate enum name of given alternative interpretation, then it would explain that this too many arguments was for `tp to...

IMO much better now:  Although the "Provided argument list..." part is a bit too verbose IMO, any suggestions? The offset information is also redundant, count should be good enough.

Ewww being normal Who invented that

This kind of message with all the variants is only shown for unions, if there is only a struct with one set of arguments it will stop on first error...

    I would leave those, otherwise it is less readable, mind that adding a leading space will not work as good as in Github UI because chat...


Never mind, message without extra spaces also looks fine, thanks to that `/tp`: