Jason Kulatunga

Hmm, are you saying that I should be running mergerfs inside a container? We may be talking past each other. Let me give you a bit of context for what...

Hmm, it just seemed weird to run mergerfs inside a container, since I needed to share the mounted filesystem with other containers, but you're right, it looks like it might...

yeah, that would be appreciated.

LGTM. I think it would be valuable to add a test suite for gitmask. Would you be interested in taking on some of that work @ikedam ?

not sure if this is possible to fix, we api doesn't state how to create PR on a renamed repo. https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/#edit

This is definitely an interesting option, however I think the default should still be squashing the commits together. It's possible to use commit datetime analysis to narrow down probable author...

@ikedam @j-rewerts I just released a new version of Gitmask that acts as a true `git remote`. It doesn't yet support preserving git commit messages, but I'll be adding support...

Hey @sraedler Unfortunately the way gitmask v1 is designed, its not very easy to do that. I'm working on an update to gitmask that acts as a git remote, which...

Hey @sraedler I've updated Gitmask with the `beta` branch, finally adding `git remote` compatibility. In the next couple of weeks I'll be adding a support for anonymous github pr comments.

Maybe use https://github.com/radovskyb/watcher instead? How do we handle large documents that are still open and being written to?