alfresco-transform-core
alfresco-transform-core copied to clipboard
ImageMagick Preview Resoultion is not the same for all file formats
When using Alfresco 6.2.0 with ImageMagick (latest) im getting different Preview Resoultion based on different file formats. PNG & JPEG generate previews in 1024 px (as expected) while other file formats like PDF generates a preview in 841 px or 842 px and TXT in 792 px.
Im using Alfresco Community Version 6.2.0 and the helm chart from https://github.com/Alfresco/acs-community-deployment. For ImageMagick im using the latest tag of https://hub.docker.com/r/alfresco/alfresco-imagemagick/tags
In my code im using org.alfresco.repo.rendition2.RenditionService2 to render the preview. My Bean configuration:
<bean id="xxxx" class="org.alfresco.repo.rendition2.RenditionDefinition2Impl">
<constructor-arg name="renditionName" value="xxx"/>
<constructor-arg name="targetMimetype" value="image/png"/>
<constructor-arg name="transformOptions">
<map>
<entry key="resizeWidth" value="1024"/>
<entry key="resizeHeight" value="1024"/>
<entry key="allowEnlargement" value="false" />
<entry key="maintainAspectRatio" value="true"/>
<entry key="thumbnail" value="true"/>
<entry key="timeout" value="${system.thumbnail.definition.default.timeoutMs}" />
</map>
</constructor-arg>
<constructor-arg name="registry" ref="renditionDefinitionRegistry2"/>
</bean>
I used the same code and configuration in 6.1.2 and got the expected result that all file formats are at 1024 px.
I created 3 simple documents i can reproduce this issue with: I uploaded them to v6.2.0 and v.6.1.2 and downloaded the preview with those results:
Test.pdf Test.png Test.txt 6 1 2ThumbnailPdf 6 1 2ThumbnailPng 6 1 2ThumbnailTxt 6 2 0ThumbnailPdf 6 2 0ThumbnailPng 6 2 0ThumbnailTxt
Please let me know if you need more information. I dont work reagulary or much with Alfresco so im not sure which other information may be necessary.
For ref: https://hub.alfresco.com/t5/alfresco-content-services-forum/preview-resolution-after-upgrade-to-6-2-0-has-changed/td-p/297783
any news/updates on this issue ?