Akuli

I would prefer "practicality beats purity". Even though we usually want to prevent false positives, we also don't want people to ship broken code to production, which IMO is more...

By broken code, I mean code that doesn't work as intended, in this case `set[Foo] - set[Bar]` where the author doesn't intend to deal with objects that are simultaneously `Foo`...

@AlexWaygood What are your thoughts on this issue? Your PR #7161 made the methods inconsistent, and while you argued that `Any` is better (as in this issue), you apparently didn't...

There is more discussion about this in #10013.

This now has a merge conflict, but it should be much simpler now that #12395 is merged.

Supporting a roslyn-speciic thing seems fine, but it would be nice to mark Roslyn-specific things with `# needed only for roslyn langserver` or similar. Adding a test that actually invokes...

Currently, the only place where you find a cheat sheet is this issue. (Click the little arrow thing. It will expand.) Feel free to make a PR that adds the...

I don't think they have changed much, but the table seems incomplete. It has many empty cells. Instead of looking at the code, the best way to figure them out...

Clarification: it would be useful even if it doesn't find `def foo()` from the file, and just shows some part of the file selected by user.

It takes up screen space. I usually have Porcupine and something else side by side.